Realização dos princípios de transparência da administração pública na República de Sakha (Yakutia)

Mariia Rubtcova; Elena Vasilieva; Valentina Kaisarova

doi:10.21710/rch.v26i0.519

Autores/as

Mariia Rubtcova Associate Professor in the Department of Sociology at the Saint Petersburg State University, Russia.
Elena Vasilieva Associate Professor in the Faculty of Public and Municipal Administration of the North-West Institute of Management, branch of RANEPA, Russia.
Valentina Kaisarova Associate Professor in the Department of Management and Planning of Socio-Economic Processes, Saint Petersburg State University, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21710/rch.v26i0.519

Palabras clave:

serviço público, transparência, região ártica, administração pública, sociedade civil, práticas de gestão

Resumen

O artigo é dedicado ao estudo dos princípios de transparência da administração pública na República de Sakha (Yakutia). Para Yakutia - a região ártica da Federação Russa, a disponibilidade das instituições da sociedade civil para participar ativamente da solução de problemas sociais é uma questão importante. Em 2018, foi realizado um estudo sobre a avaliação das práticas sociais de organização da interação entre o serviço público e os cidadãos da República de Sakha (Yakutia). Na primeira etapa, os autores fizeram uma análise de conteúdo baseada em 28 regulamentos administrativos. Na segunda etapa, foi aplicado questionário. Os entrevistados são estudantes (N = 280) e funcionários públicos (N = 139). Os resultados mostraram que é necessário garantir abertura e transparência no processo de tomada de decisões. No entanto, os cidadãos ainda não estão prontos para participar ativamente da administração pública.

Biografía del autor/a

Mariia Rubtcova, Associate Professor in the Department of Sociology at the Saint Petersburg State University, Russia.

Mariia RubtcovaÂ got her Candidate (PhD) Degree in Sociology of Management in St. Petersburg State University and the Doctoral Degree in Herzen State Pedagogical University.

Elena Vasilieva, Associate Professor in the Faculty of Public and Municipal Administration of the North-West Institute of Management, branch of RANEPA, Russia.

Elena VasilievaÂ got her Candidate (PhD) Degree in Sociology of Management in St. Petersburg State University and the Doctoral Degree in St. Petersburg State University.

Valentina Kaisarova, Associate Professor in the Department of Management and Planning of Socio-Economic Processes, Saint Petersburg State University, Russian Federation

Valentina KaisarovaÂ got her Candidate (PhD) Degree in Economics in St. Petersburg State University

Citas

Anderman, E. M., Austin A. C., & Johnson D. M. (2001). The development of goal orientation. Development of achievement motivation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Armstrong, M., & Baron, A. (1998). Performance Management: The new realities. London, CIPD.

Atamanchuk, G. V. (2008). The Essence of Public Service: The History, Theory, Law, and Practice. Moscow: RAGS Publisher.

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1995). The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise on Sociology of Knowledge. Moscow: Moscow Philosophical Foundation.

Borisov, A., Narozhnaia, D., Tarando, E., Vorontsov, A., Pruel, N., & Nikiforova, O. (2018). Destructive motivation of personnel: a case study of Russian comercial companies. Entrepreneurship and Sustainbility Issues, 6(1), 253-267.

Chan, H. S., & Suizhou, E. L. (2007). ‘Civil service law in the People’s Republic of China: a return to cadre personnel management’. Public Administration Review, 67(3), 383-398.

Curristine, T. (2005). ‘Government Performance: Lessons and Challenge’. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 5(1), 127-151.

Dana, L.-P. (2017). Entrepreneurship in Western Europe: a contextual perspective. New Jersey: World Scientific.

Dessler, G. (2013). Human Resource management. 13-th edition. US: Prentice Hall.

Duka, A. V. (2008). ‘Theoretical problems in studies of power elites’. Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 11(1), 50-70.

El'meev, V. Y., & Tarando, E. E. (1999). Social goods and socialization of property. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, 1, 41-48.

Gellén, M. (2013). ‘Professionalization of civil service in Hungary: the potential impacts of centralizing public administration education’. Mednarodnarevijazajavnou pravo, 11(2), 93-104.

Gormley, W. T., & Balla, S. (2013). Bureaucracy and Democracy. Accountability and Performance. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.

Graaf, G., & Paanakker, H. (2014). Good Governance: Performance Values and Procedural Values in Conflict. American Review of Public Administration, 45(6), 635-652.

Hayden, F. G. (june, 1988). Values, Beliefs, and Attitudes in a Sociotechnical Setting. Journal of Economic Issues, XXII(2), 415-426.

Henri, J.-F. (2004). ‘Performance Measurement and Organizational Effectiveness: Bridging the Gap’. Managerial Finance, 30, 93-123.

Héritier, A. (2001). The Politics of Public Services in European Regulation, Max-Planck-Projektgruppe Recht der Gemeinschaftsgüter Bonn 2001/1 [online]. Accessed 20 June, 2016, retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract_id=269314

Hood, C. (1986). Administrative Analysis: An Introduction to Rules, Enforcement and Organizations. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.

Kettl, D. (2000). The Global Public Management Revolution: A Report on the Transformation of Governance. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.

Magomedov, K. O. (2010). Civil Service Sociology. Moscow: Publishing House of RAGS.

Makarin, A. V. (2006). The Bureaucracy as an Institution of Power. St. Petersburg: Publisher of the St. Petersburg State University.

Malinina, T. B., Dadianova, I. B., Tarando, E. E., Pruel, N. A., & Malychev, V. A. (2015). ‘Information presentation of professional structure of Russian society in mass media’. Review of European Studies, 7(9), 41-59.

McCourt, W. (2013). Models of Public Service Reform. A Problem-Solving Approach. Policy Research working paper, No. WPS 6428, World Bank, Washington, DC.

Niskanen, W. A. (1975). ‘Bureaucrats and politicians’. The Journal of law and Economics, 18(3), 617-643.

Olson, M. (march, 1996). ‘The Economics of Autocracy and Majority rule. The invisible hand and the use of force’. Journal of Economic Literature, 34 (1), 72-96.

Rubtcova, M., Pavenkov, O., Pavenkov, V., & Vasilieva, E. (2015a). ‘The language of altruism: corpus-based conceptualisation of social category for management sociology’. Asian Social Science, 11(13), 289-297.

Rubtcova, M., Pavenkov, O., Pavenkov, V., & Vasilieva, E. (2015b). ‘Representations of trust to public service in Russian newspapers during election time: corpus-based content analysis in public administration sociology’. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4), S1, 436-444.

Rubtsova, M. V. (2007). ‘Manageability: sociological theoretical analysis of notions’. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, 12, 32-38.

Rubtsova, M. V., & Vasilieva, E. A. (2016). ‘Conceptualization and operationalization of notion ‘trust’ for applied sociological research’. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, 1, 58-65.

Rubtsova, M. V. V. (2011). ‘Governmentability in interactions of subjects. Traditional and new practices’. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2, 46-53.

Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Moscow: Eksmo.

Vasilieva, E. A. (2018). Sacredness and professionalism of modern bureaucracy. Society. Wednesday. Development. 1(46), 25-30.

Vasilieva, E. A. (2011). ‘The mythology of power: a sociological aspect’. Science and Education, 3, 119-121.

Vasilieva, E. A. (2015) ‘Bureaucracy. Public civil service. Structure and structure of public servants. Reform of public service’. In G. A. Menshikova, & N. A. Pruyel (Eds.). Introduction in Public and Municipal Administration: Modern Approach (pp. 91-106). Moscow: Publishing House of Yurayt.

Veber, M. (1994). Izbrannoye. Obraz obshestva [Selected. The Image of Society]. Moscow: Jurist.

Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2001). The Development of Achievement Motivation. San Diego, CA: Academic.

Wintrobe, R. (1997). Modern Bureaucratic Theory, Perspectives on Public Choice: А Handbook. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Woods D., & Waterman, R. (1994). ‘Bureaucratic Dynamics: The Role of Bureaucracy in a Democracy’. Boulder: Westview.

Wyckoff, G. (1990). ‘Bureaucracy, inefficiency and time’. Public Choice, 67(2), 169-179.

Yuzhakov, V. N. (2015). ‘Governance for Results: On the Preparing of Draft Federal Law «On Fundamentals of Public Administration in the Russian Federation»’. Public Administration Issues, 1, 129-148.